Technology supports. The professional understands and decides.
Human oversight is more than an approval button. Professionals must understand what Casey shows, recognise missing context and be able to amend or reject suggestions.
Control begins before use
An organisation defines in advance what Casey may and may not be used for, who reviews the output and which data is necessary.
Without clear purpose and ownership, technology may influence decisions that require professional judgement.
Understandable support
A signal is only useful when its basis and degree of certainty are visible. Missing information must never be silently inferred.
The intended interface therefore keeps source, context, gaps and provisional status visible.
- Traceable conversation signals
- Explicit information gaps
- Provisional status where needed
- Visible professional review
Meaningful human control
Professionals can reinterpret, add to or reject a suggestion. That requires time, authority and sufficient information.
A well-designed workflow also records who reviewed the information and which version was ultimately used.
No replacement for expertise
Casey does not diagnose and does not independently determine what a person can, wants or should do. Human expertise remains necessary to assess context, proportionality and the appropriate next step.
Pilots therefore explicitly examine whether the support strengthens professional autonomy and whether users correctly recognise uncertainty.
Responsible product demonstration
Experience how human review remains visible in every Casey step.
We show both useful signals and situations in which Casey deliberately provides no final outcome.